Opinion: Tea Party is About Patriotism
"Unlike the government, the private sector has to produce. If we do not, then our business does not succeed."
By Sean Halliburton, Goose Creek, S.C.
I read an article submitted by Senator Robert Ford regarding our nation's economic difficulties and his willingness to place blame on the Tea Party for stalling the policies of the Obama Administration. I believe Sen. Ford to be an honorable man and his opinion, even if I do not agree with it, is his point of view. However, as identifying those individuals that have changed the direction of the country by promoting fiscal responsibility and a return to our founding principles is not a matter of obstruction, but one of patriotism.
The government and politicians do not understand the complexity of the business model and how regulations, taxes, and uncertainty affect the bottom line. As a Health Care Manager, our business model is constantly under review where you are uncertain about cuts in Medicaid/Medicare reimbursement, financial obligations to be compliant with the recent health care law, and a growing list of rules that are constantly changing and taking a considerable amount of time to understand. In addition, the environment and attitude of this administration towards the business community has been less than inviting with their relentless attacks on individual success have prompted a greater divide by feeding into the "Occupy" movement. But it is clear, that until the government embraces the free market and reduce regulations, businesses will choose not to hire.
Unlike the government, the private sector has to produce. If we do not, then our business does not succeed. We do not have the option of raising revenue through taxes; we have to match what we take in and manage our revenue against our expenses. This is something that the government is unwilling to do. In Sen. Ford’s article what stood out was not what he said, but the year he started to say it. In 2008, the Democrat Party maintained a super majority in the House and Senate. For two years, they could pass anything they wanted to and the Republicans could not do anything. What did they do, they spent $700 Billion dollars on a stimulus package that did nothing, an additional $500 million dollars on Solyndra who filed for bankruptcy months after receiving it, the Dodd-Frank legislation that has handcuffed the financial market and of course, spending a trillion dollars on the health care act that will bring 21 new taxes on individuals and businesses. In addition to all this, the Obama administration plans to let the Bush era tax cuts expire. Are you impressed now that this administration has created more debt in 3 ½ years than 8 years of the Bush Administration! If you find yourself driving into the rear end of the car in front of you; your choice is to step on the gas or apply the break. The Tea Party has applied the break.
It is understandable that Senator Ford and the Democratic Party is inviting to others. Why would they not be? There are those who wish to achieve the riches of life without ever working for them. There are those who wish to get a pay check without a day of labor. There are those who believe they are entitled to the biggest house on the block even if they do not qualify or can't pay for it. Most importantly, we continue to subsidize irresponsibility by constantly coming to the rescue of others and rewarding poor behavior. Yes, this may be popular among some in our society but it is not what the Tea Party believes in. Hard work should always be rewarded and never penalized. We must reward the risk takers and investors; they are the life blood of our way of life, and make government accountable to living within their means. Why is that a bad thing?
Senator Ford, we have tried the progressive economic theory for two years, without obstruction, and it has been a disaster. This country is broke and the idea of punishing success and taking more from others is not a recipe for economic growth. If you do not believe me, look at Greece. You apparently admire their mythology. How is it working out for them?
Now, I am a member of the Tea Party and believe we should return to the founding principles. But, do I like the idea of gridlock, not at all. What I would do is challenge you and others in government, to sit down and come up with a solution that makes Democrats and Republicans nervous to come out of that room and knowing full well that the decision they made is what’s right rather than what’s popular for their ideological groups. It is only then, when government truly works for the people, that bi-partisanship becomes an effective government tool.
Tom
10:48 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012
The Tea Party is a load of crap and needs to fade away.
Jim Uchneat
7:39 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Funny you didn't mention that when the President and the Speaker of the House sat down and negotiated a debt ceiling deal the Tea Party members of the republican party killed it. The implications of that are going to hit in January. South Carolina is going to be hit hard. Sean also forgot to mention that under the Bush administration which offered little oversight of the financial industry Americans lost 25-40% of their 401K value and home values. By the way, Bush also left us with unfunded tax cuts and two unfunded wars. Too bad the Tea Party wasn't around in 2000.
S.D. Halliburton
9:57 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Jim you have to do your homework. The Bush Administration DID submit legislation regarding financial reform that was killed in committee by Barney Franks. This identified the housing industry was in the verge of collapse by selling off worthless paper. When the housing industry crashed so did the housing industry and the affects of this hit the 401k industry (mine lost 10%). But I am a slow growth invester. The revenue to the Treasury was 1.78 Trillion and when the tax cuts went into affect revenue jumped to 2.56 trillion (wow more money Jim). The problem was spending went from 2.1 Trillion to 2.7 Trillion. The last year of the Bush Administration was a total receipt of revenue 2.56 Trillion and expenses 2.72 Trillion with $356 Billion of that defiict the first congressial approval (Bi-Partisan) was the TARP program. Doing homework on government can really change your mind. It did me, Look at the web site www.opensecrets.com it exposes all of government factually.
S.D. Halliburton
10:17 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
my bad www.opensecrets.org
stanley seigler
9:47 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
@S.D. Halliburton: '...The revenue to the Treasury was 1.78 Trillion and when the tax cuts went into affect revenue jumped to 2.56 trillion...'
interesting figs...i couldn't find them on the opensecrets web site...help please, where can i find a ref to these figures...would like to do some 'homework on government'...
stanley seigler
1:28 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
PS
re: '...where can i find a ref to these figures...[stanley]
never mind i am looking at charts confirming these figures...
now am trying to understand what S.D. Halliburton's conclusions are based on these figs...and
in general,what conclusions can be...should be... drawn from these figs...was/is spending necessary to get us out of the 2008 ditch...it did get us out of the 1929 ditch...
where would the economy have been without this spending...
a concrete example is the spending bailout of detroit: jobs saved, GM now number one in the world...what would the results of letting GM go bankrupt have been
is spending a negative or an investment...
Katana
7:55 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Obama has added a lot of debt. And it does matter. We have got to cut spending!
January 20, 2009: The National Debt Was $10,626,877,048,913.08 (Obama Takes Office). (Treasury Department)
May 22, 2012: The National Debt Was $15,721,218,607,447.09 (Most Recent). (Treasury Department)
JoSCh
8:57 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
"We have tried the progressive economic theory for two years, without obstruction, and it has been a disaster."
Were you not around for 2002-2008? And what exactly has changed from 2008 to now economically? Hell, what has changed significantly since the 80's? The "job creators" have enjoyed near historically low tax rates for the last decade and what did the "job consumers" get for carrying an increased load? The promised jobs shipped overseas due to deregulation or lost to technology. Decreased salary and Increased prices for consumer goods. Also, the Obama administration isn't proposing letting 98% of the Bush tax cuts to expire, only the top 2 %. Patch, if you're going to let just anybody write editorials you should at least make sure they aren't posting outright lies.
In your closing paragraph the first sentence is in direct opposition to the rest of the text. The tea party was almost immediately hijacked by right wing ideologues. It's too bad, taxation on the people without representation is a founding principle of America, but the tea party in it's current iteration isn't fighting for that, you're fighting for increased corporate and aristocracy control of our government.
S.D. Halliburton
10:15 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Blowing the same buggle my friend as I did with the Reform Party. I have chosen to leave the GOP in 2004 and have been Independant since then. I was against the expansion of Medicaid D (unfunded) but supported the tax programs. You are right about the Tea Party getting hijacked. The Tea Party is an ideological belief in fiscal responsibility, when in crosses into social issues is when I get upset. I want my kids to have a better future than I have and until Democrats and Republicans get serious about the issues (see closing paragraph) we will soon look like California or even worse Greece or Spain. If you are concerned I would recommend research on www.opensecrets.org. What you find is very alarming and may want you to rethink how you view the world. But I appreciate your comments...other than the "lie" slam.
JoSCh
11:18 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
In my defense I only slammed you because you lied.
The Tea Party is what it is, not just the parts you or I may like. A large portion of their message is no longer patriotic.
I'm very familiar with opensecrets, and yes, the current state of the system is very alarming.
Have you heard of nolabels.org? They propose a lot of ideas that would prompt our congress and presidency to work. They offer some good preliminary steps and I recommend them to anyone who wants our government back.
S.D. Halliburton
1:26 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
I am still confused on what the "lie" is? Can you please let me know?
JoSCh
3:23 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
There are several, but the one I specifically was referring to is " the Obama administration plans to let the Bush era tax cuts expire." The Obama administration pushed for 98% of the Bush tax cuts to be extended. The Tea Party won't compromise on this tax break for the vast majority of Americans. instead they are forcing a raise in taxes for ALL Americans because of that last, richest 2%.