There goes Romney! Kiss of death!

This is very surprising -- he is the least conservative of the GOP circus. Makes no sense, unless.... maybe he offered her the VP slot!

No what probably happened is Newt didn't kiss her ring.

Everyone has their favorite candidate, there is no logical reason why one should slander another because of their choice. Stick with your candidate and leave the others along.

Be blessed Joe.

I'll try

I have decided to forgive Newt of his past because if God can forgive him, so can I. I believe that he is the best candidate in the field for not only beating Obabma, but also for leading our country out of this mess.

I really do not understand the conservative message, I want the government to be conservative i could care less what the elected person is! I have gay friends who are conservative, they believe in small government, medicare reform, private SS accounts etc etc, what we end up getting is conservative candidates who think they know how to run our lives!

@Karen: "...God can forgive him, so can I.

COMMENT
tho not a religious scholar, nor a fan of organized religion...believe one has to repent for God to forgive...

newt has not repented...he is his old arrogant, narcissist, a-hole, self...the pillsbury dough boy's evil twin...butbutt;

i'm pulling for newt. he is the best candidate to ensure BO's re-election...DEMs "cheer, cheer for old/new newt..."
BTW
"Gingrich, showing a distrust for his fellow Republicans' judgement, saw fit to supply the leaders with two lists of keywords,..." for the DEMs:

"Anti-flag, anti-family, anti-child, anti-jobs, betray, coercion, collapse, consequences, corruption, crises, decay,...etcetc..." http://www.politicalstrategy.org/archives/000013.php

and the GOP sheep follow newts judgement...

Great! The more support Rommney receives the better chances for Obama. Go Nicki you picked another loser, just like yourself. Tea party is dead just like Bachman

Boy - do we need an FDR now. 1934 elections, just a little over a year since FDR won the presidency from a Republican, Herbert Hoover.
-------------
"No one was prepared for the actual results. Expected to pick-up a few score (House) seats the Republicans lost thirteen instead. In the Senate the rout of the GOP was even more devastating. There the Democrats won better than a two-thirds majority. The nine new Democratic Senators -one was Missouri's Harry Truman-swelled the parties total to a dazzling 69 seats."

FDR was a Communist, not even a socialist! He destroyed this country and we are till paying for his grandiose ideas!

Hoover was correct, we should have let Hitler and Stalin destroy each other, instead we recognized Stalin as the lesser of 2 evils and then payed the price for the next 50 years! George, PLEASE go take a history course!

1934.
"The voters elected a new House of 322 Democrats to 103 Republicans, and 10 Progreesives or Farmer-Laborites. Never in the history of the Republican party has its percentage of House seats fallen so low."
FDR and the new Deal, William Leuctenburg, Page 116.

And Roosevelt lied to the AMerican people swearing that he would not end our boys off to fight the European fight, he sided with the Russians and sold our soul!

Thousands of Communists infiltrated our highest levels of Government under Roosevelt.

@George Grace: "...we need an FDR now..."

we have one: BO...many similarities in the first 3 years of FDR and BO's administrations...and in their compassion for the least...BO may be closer to po folks than FDR...as FDR came from the super rich...possible the 1% of his day.

BTW unemployment during FDR's first three years, around 25%...same period for BO around 9%...FDR was elected to 4 terms...GOPtpers give thanks presidents can only be elected to two terms now...

would like to see a little more of FDR's "i welcome their hate" in BO...

"we have one: BO"
I agree. Now the question is how to get the vote out to get those Congressional numbers i quoted above - the majorities.

The Demos had the majority in the senate, the house and a Dem President in 2008 and we know what happened.

@Eddie Bennett: "The Demos had the majority in the senate, the house and a Dem President in 2008 and we know what happened'

COMMENT
for the record
GOPs controlled house from 1995 til 2006 and 2011 to present; the presidency from 2001-2008

DEMs controlled house from 2007-2008; presidency from 2009 to present...

senate: GOPs 1997-2007; DEMs 2008-2011

kinda hard for DEMs to turn the ship of state around after the GOPs steered it into the shallows for 8-10 years...then handcuffed (block BO congress) the helmsman for 2-3 years...ie,

drove our great country into a ditch...and their policy to get it out is to make their JOB#1 to make BO a one term president...and return to the 1929 (great depression), 2008 (great recession) policies

seems the GOPs took governance lessons in wonderland from the red queen and humpdy dumpty...

This is serious. Lindsay Graham and the other SC "twits" have gotten the "detention" provision in the Nat'l Defense Auth Act up for Obama's signature. All it takes is suspicion of terrorism, not a judges signature much less a trial. We are getting real close to fascism people. Who's to say they couldn't use the bill against the Occupy movement?
--------------
"According to a Forbes report the NDAA contains provisions that would allow anyone, even American citizens, to be arrested without having committed a crime. Those arrested could be imprisoned for life without charges or trials. They would disappear, never to be seen again, without due process of law. "
--------
How can we get these guys out of office?

@George Grace: "Those arrested could be imprisoned for life without charges or trials. They would disappear, never to be seen again, without due process of law. "...How can we get these guys out of office?"

COMMENTS
what the F are levin and mccain thinking...besides “denigrating the very foundations of this country"...it was/is a diversion from JOBS, JOBS, JOBS...

CLIPSs
I seriously don’t care if you’re a liberal or a conservative or a libertarian or a Zen anarchist. So long as you aren’t Carl Levin or John McCain, the bill’s architects, you can join the Civil Liberties Caucus. Spencer writes:

Weirder still, the bill’s chief architect, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), tried to persuade skeptics that the bill wasn’t so bad. His pitch? “The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States,” he said on the Senate floor on Monday. The bill would just letthe government detain a citizen in military custody, not force it to do that. Reassured yet?

Civil libertarians aren’t. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) said it “denigrates the very foundations of this country.” Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) added, “it puts every single American citizen at risk.” [end clips]
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/12/05/the-national-defense-authorization-act-is-the-greatest-threat-to-civil-liberties-americans-face/

I agree with George, this law throws out the Constitution once and for all and it shows both parties are complicit in the betrayal of our land!

To see how Romney's Mormon faith would affect him in the White House, go to mittromneycult.blogspot.com

re: go to mittromneycult.blogspot.com

if anyone has not gone to above link...DONT...unless you are a bigot...

Too bad she decided to give Romney cover on his stand, expressed in Nevada
to not send our nuclear waste to the high yield repository there. We've got
it all, and DOE has promised to move it to the completed repository in Nevada.
Obama has blocked it, and Haley has sworn to get it moved. Jim Y.