patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Republican Showdown in District 97 Highlighted

Chamber of Commerce-Journal Scene forum featured five candidates in four races.

 

Republican voters got a second chance to see S.C. House District 97 Republican candidates debate the issues Tuesday.

The forum by Greater Summerville/Dorchester County Chamber of Commerce and Summerville Journal Scene was originally designed to include multiple race debates, but the only showdown of the night was for S.C. House District 97, featuring opponents Jordan Bryngelson and Ed Carter, both hoping to challenge Democratic incumbent Patsy Knight in the fall. 

Many candidates dropped out at the last second for work obligations and other reasons, Tuesday's GOP debate continued with Sheriff L.C. Knight, County Council District 4 challenger John Hull and S.C. Senate District 38 challenger Sean Bennett facing no rivals. No candidates for County Council District 6 were present.

But the show went on, as moderator and Journal Scene publisher Ellen Priest posed questions to the candidates. 

Bryngelson and Carter faced a series of questions, submitted by voters and selected by the debate sponsors. Watch the video to see how they answered how they would define "tax reform" and what they would restore to the S.C. budget

Bryngelson and Carter began to show their differing views in the first GOP debate, sponsored by Patch and the Dorchester County Republican Party, in April. Tuesday's debate allowed the candidates to express their views on tax reform, restoring state budget cuts and job growth.

Watch the full recorded debate here

Both candidates touted their experience and smaller government. Bryngelson has worked within the Republican party, and Carter has worked within the Chamber of Commerce. 

Bryngelson opened the debate with a focus on education.

"I will fight to have better quality education," Bryngelson said. "Education is a key component there (with jobs)" 

Carter opened the debate encouraged by the crowd doing "their civic duty" and launched into talking about jobs.

"I'm all about economic development; I'm all about jobs," Carter said. "I'm all about bringing industry and manufacturing back into Dorchester County."

On school funding, Carter said the funding was "out of whack" and that he is a "great proponent" of school choice. 

"We need to talk about the funding formula to ensure that all the different counties and different school districts are funded to the amount that they need to provide a quality education," Carter said.

Bryngelson said he and his opponent don't "differ very much" on education funding. He added that education also means jobs.

"Ultimately, if you have an educated workforce then you can really attract jobs," Bryngelson said.

The candidates both highlighted a burdensome tax system making it "prohibitive" to do business in the state. 

"We've got to address the subject in real ways, not tax shifts, but tax cuts," Bryngelson said.

Carter focused on rebuilding the tax system.

"Not around the edges, not around the periphery ... but everything on the table and build a tax system that is fair and equitable to everybody," he said. 

Priest then asked the candidates what, if anything, they would want to see restored to the slimmer S.C. budget that faced many cuts in the past few years.

"No. 1, we have to look at our prisons, jailers and law enforcement and restore those to a healthy level," Carter said, adding that government's role is to protect the people. 

Bryngelson said he disagreed "fundamentally" with restoring the budget back to the times of prosperity and proposed sunset budgets — Carter disagreed.

Both candidates agreed the state should have no role in helping mortgagees in foreclosure or expanding evacuation routes to four lanes.

Related Topics: Ed Carter, Great Summerville/Dorchester County Chamber of Commerce, John Hull, Jordan Bryngelson, Journal Scene, LC Knight, Sean Bennett, and elections 2012

Jason Lattimore

1:07 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Ed Carter is a RINO, he ran as a Democrat last time and pledged his allegiance to the Democratic party, now he's doing the same thing as a "Republican". He's an opportunist at best and the rumor mill has him switching back if he ultimately should happen to win the seat. If you trust him as a conservative perhaps I could interest you in some oceanfront property in Oklahoma or maybe a nice riverhouse in the middle of the Sahara Desert.

Reply

maizenbluedoc

10:53 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

Why does a candidate have to be identified as a "liberal" or "conservative"?. I believe the only purpose this serves is to divide voters by making them vote for only two choices. Why not vote for the candidate that may a middle-of-the-road person who can get the job done? I am not a liberal by any means, but I am also amenable to voting for the candidate that I believe best serves their constituents. It is impossible to make everyone happy, but some times it pays to compromise. I prefer a person who solves problems, not just playing the political game. Yes, I usually subscribe to the Repulican philosophy, but have voted for Democrats and Independents in the past.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SDR

12:28 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012

The old conservative-liberal distinction once served the purpose of identifying if a candidate preferred market solutions to problems or government solutions to problems. Since all politicians now see government as the only solution, it is a moot point. Conservative has reduced down to a series of statements that include terms like "cut taxes" and "family values", whatever those terms mean.

Leave a comment