.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: C.M. Walker

C.M. Walker writes Patch supporting Sheriff candidate Mike Turner.

I have noticed a lot of letters to the editor in favor of our current Sheriff L.C. Knight. I can assume different reasons for this, but we all know what assuming means. I can only write about what I know and the things and people I believe in. I am a citizen of Dorchester County and I have been paying attention to Sheriff Knight’s term in office and I have to say, some of Mr. Knight’s actions, the way he has conducted himself and his campaign have been a disgrace to the line of work his deputies have worked in, take extreme amounts of pride in and in some cases gave their life for. I know Mike Turner personally, not as well as several others do, but enough to make up my own mind about this man.

Anyone can take pen to paper and write on situations leaving out certain details that would make something appear different than it actually is. That is one of the beautiful things about the written word, but distasteful to the readers. The only people that take this kind of writing to heart are the ones that do not know the full story.

In regards to recent letters overstretching the truth about Mr. Turner and trying to connect him to situations that were beyond his control, I have a few things to say. I know the situation that involved a Mr. Smith and it appears that Mr. Pia has tried to paint this situation with a bright and cheerful colored brush by leaving out some very important details. Mr. Smith beat a handcuffed, defenseless man in the back seat of a patrol car; he lied about it, took a polygraph test and failed, then later admitted to it. There was a unanimous vote at the Criminal Justice Academy (CJA) that stripped Mr. Smith of his badge. When Mr. Knight was voted into office, one of the first things he did was appeal to the CJA’s decision. His appeal was first denied then later over turned by the Director of the CJA, who was also a former supervisor of Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith now is a Lieutenant at the Sheriff’s Department.  All of this I found doing my own research into the incident. The way you explained the incident, Mr. Pia, I applaud you, I got a laugh out of it. Mr. Smith was serving his punishment when Mr. Knight went to bat for him. In reference to something I read before, I say this, this does not show what a great man Mr. Smith may have been, but only how tarnished our Sheriff is.

As far as the incident with Mr. Turner taking prescription drugs that were not his. The fact that people need to bring up something as small as, he had a headache and took medicine for it back in 1989, shows just how far you have to reach to find something about Mr. Turner, something that has no bearing on his ability to do his job.

In regards to the videos that are out there, I am glad they are there. It allows people to make up their own minds about Mr. Knight and Mr. Turner, who cares who video tapped them. The videos that are being referred to by Mr. Taylor, I had the chance to review them after reading his letter. Mr. Taylor stated that the people who were asking questions were being coached, by the camera operator, possibly and that you can actually hear this occurring. The only thing I heard was one person, possibly the camera operator, tell someone else not to say anything, hardly the incriminating evidence Mr. Taylor made it out to be. How dare you assume that victimized citizens are being coached to ask questions to their sheriff about problems in their neighborhood. In one debate, , I was very unsettled by Mr. Knight’s demeanor. He kept his head down looking at the floor while his opponent spoke, a sign of disrespect in my opinion.

The incident pertaining to Mr. Pastor and how Mr. Knight and Mr. Turner responded to a question, let’s not blow smoke and mirrors, everyone knows who the person was talking about. Mr. Turner was not Sheriff, at that time; therefore he did not have control in what happened to Mr. Pastor. I am sure Mr. Turner hates the fact that something like this happened, but the outcome of the situation is not his fault. Mr. Knight stated he would investigate them and fire them if it happened under his watch. So according to the situation with Mr. Smith and the situation with Mr. Pastor, I can conclude that Mr. Knight does not stand for people stealing money, but does not seem to have an issue with beating defenseless men in the back seats of patrol cars.

In regards to Mr. Turner’s education, how dare you attack Mr. Turner, yet again, for something he has no control over.  The American InterContinental University, was, is, and remains an accredited university. It seems you left that part out of your letter to the editor. Looking at the rest of his education, Graduate of the Citadel, the Criminal Justice Academy, and the FBI National Academy, I would have to say Mr. Turner not only has a legitimate Master’s in Business Administration but severely out does Mr. Knight in Education.  I am deeply sorry the person you are voting for does not have these credentials. All Mr. Knight has is a Minor at a junior college in Economics and Education.

In regards to the Retirement gift that was given to him, in the form of a Shadow Box with a firearm engraved with his name on it, it is my understanding that Mr. Turner is not the only officer that received this gift. So instead of attacking Mr. Turner for receiving a gift that was well deserved for his years of service to his community, if you have an issue with this, talk to Mr. Nash the giver of the gifts and ask him why a gift of the price you stated was given.

It is my understanding that Mr. Knight is working with a budget that is $3 million more a year than Mr. Nash had, but he cannot afford to have things such as a SWAT team? I also understand the SWAT team had all new gear before Mr. Knight took office, gear that is now sitting in storage somewhere not being used. This seems like a waste of resources. Charleston County may have a grant to aid surrounding counties, but they cannot aid surrounding counties if they are using their resources. Why take the chance with citizens’ lives? Mr. Taylor states that Dorchester County citizens spend money in Charleston County, but he does not “wish to imply that the Charleston County Sheriff’s Office or its citizens owe Dorchester County”. Mr. Taylor gave no other reason for this statement, so I have to imply that is exactly what he meant. By that logic, Mr. Taylor, your logic, Dorchester County should have its own SWAT team to share with Charleston County because I am sure Charleston County citizens spend money in Dorchester County. Mr. Knight also claims to have given money back but the moment he took office he immediately changed the patrol vehicles and uniforms of all deputies, how much money did this cost and was it necessary?

Mr. Taylor also goes on to say that crime rate has gone down 11% throughout the entire state. I can assure you Mr. Taylor and fellow voters; Mr. Knight is not responsible for the 11% drop in crime rate throughout the entire state. While I love this state, I am truly only concerned with the crime statistics in the county I live in, not York County which is over 150 miles away or any other county. According to statistics that I found on the SLED website, a website Mr. Knight should be familiar with, murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault all went up by 2009, when Mr. Knight was in office. Now to be perfectly fair to Mr. Knight, there were 29 rapes in 2009 which is more than in 2008 when rape was at 19, but less than when Mr. Nash was in office. However there were 3 murders in 2007 when Mr. Nash was in office and 8 murders by 2009 when Mr. Knight was in office. Robbery went from 71 in 2005 to 123 in 2007, while Mr. Nash was in office and in 2008 there were 156 robberies the first year Mr. Knight was in office. There are not any numbers posted for 2011 as of yet. Here is the website for the numbers I did find,http://www.sled.sc.gov/SCCrimeBooks.aspx?MenuID=CrimeReporting

I hope voters who truly do not know who to vote for, will take the time to do a little bit of research and ask the tough questions, so they can go into the election booth with a clear head. I also hope I have changed the mind of at least one voter to vote Mike Turner instead of LC Knight. It is with great respect to the position of Sheriff that I am voting for Mike Turner on June 12th2012.

C.M. Walker

Want to be heard in Summerville Patch's Letters to the Editor? E-mail Editor Lindsay Street, lindsay.street@patch.com

maizenbluedoc June 6, 2012 at 07:55 pm
What a country!!!!!!!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Summerville Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
River Oaks Middle School May 18, 2013 at 01:49 pm
I know it's a ways away, but there are signs posted in my neighborhood about a lost beagle. SomeoneRead More could have picked this girl up here and dumped her there. I'll try to contact the person around here who posted about the lost dog.
stanley seigler May 18, 2013 at 03:23 pm
nice touch PATCH...
Lindsay Street (Editor) May 18, 2013 at 11:30 pm
Keep us posted!
JDVEHORN May 4, 2013 at 01:45 am
Its just common sense to be respectful to the person who is deciding your fate. I guess he didntRead More have any. Not to mention where is the basic decency he should adher to??--- I vote contempt.
David Farrow May 4, 2013 at 08:17 pm
contempt of court is simply contempt of court
Tony May 9, 2013 at 06:28 pm
The 30 days wasn't for "cussin" it was disrespect to the court. As to additional cost toRead More the people, it is minimum if any due to him already being in jail on a attempt murder charge. This bond hearing was for the throwing of body fluids while in jail. Now, do you have any facts to back up the part on the judge being racist?
joe April 26, 2013 at 03:14 am
SURE'u do.Why do you think the 'sealed' family court documents ended up in the media? Only issueRead More Colbert-Busch Campaign can run on.
stanley seigler April 26, 2013 at 03:29 am
@joe, re 'sealed' family records bet you cant post any sealed family records that wereRead More released...why? cause there are NONE...all records discussed on PATCH and elsewhere are public... why do family value GOPs continue to refer to sealed records when the know better...more GOP-SOP
Ajay Jain May 4, 2013 at 07:50 pm
Watch the ONLY debate between Elizabeth Colbert Busch and Mark Sanford and decide who to vote for!Read More https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpPy5u7EszM
Rob Groce March 29, 2013 at 07:50 pm
yeah, but if Smokey the Bear makes too much noise ..... KAPOW!!!
JoSCh March 29, 2013 at 10:39 pm
Apologies, I think this is a joke and I assumed it wasn't. I thought about it while I was at RedsRead More on Shem Creek. For those following the Reds saga, there was a kid in a wheel chair. I'm not aware of any wars he may have fought in, but it was 2 at the absolute most.
JoSCh March 30, 2013 at 02:03 am
Nice Rob Groce. lol
Kati Sharpe March 28, 2013 at 03:50 am
I did change my profile picture to support my gay and lesbian friends and loved ones. True LoveRead More should hold no Rules on gender. Not all couples are meant to procreate. Hetero couples don't always... can't always... shouldn't always!! It's Not Just about making More humans. It's about LOVE. ACCEPTANCE. Allowing Everyone Equal Rights... This should Not even BE an Issue. Rights are for Everyone!!!!!!!
Restore America March 28, 2013 at 05:58 am
I know people who are gay and that is their personal choice. But at the same time it does notRead More change the fact that it is unnatural ( show me 2 male or 2 females having sex that will produce offspring). For example if you put 50 "gay" male giraffes and 50 "gay" female giraffes together they will be extinct! The theory of evolution points out the fact its unnatural. Most importantly that it is clearly stated in the Bible that it is WRONG. God the Father and Jesus the son do love gays but that doesn't change the truth of the matter. If you want to define gay relationships then create a definition for it because it's not marriage. Since recorded history marriage has been between a man and woman period. The word smartphone is new to the day make up one for long term gay relationships. How about "gayrriage"?
Todd March 28, 2013 at 02:09 pm
No, this was stupid. Just like people posting the color of their bra & boxers to show supportRead More for social issues. Facebook isn't a political machine but it has apparently turned into a "follow the leader" social networking site. I support equal rights for all, just as I support finding a cure for breast cancer but all of these very dumb "mass campaigns" are ineffective.
JDVEHORN April 20, 2013 at 05:05 pm
At least they are attempting to make a living honestly instead of gangbanging your home! evenRead More "thugs" have to start somewhere. Its a hand car wash Dude, who did you EXPECT to be washing your car? Berlin G Meyers?? lol
JDVEHORN April 20, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Maybe Mark Sanford would have done a better job. Probably not though. ;)