DOJ Rejects S.C. Voter ID Law — Again

On Friday U.S. Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez responded to South Carolina's request it reconsider an objection to the state's Voter ID law

It looks like South Carolina's Voter ID law will get a day in court after Assistant U.S. Attoney General Thomas Perez again shot down the law under the voting rights act on Friday.

In a letter dated June 29, Perez responded to South Carolina's request that the Justice Department reconsider its objection to the law based on the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Perez maintained that expert opinion on the law as passed makes a persuasive case that minority groups will be disproportionately affected by the new law, which runs affowl of the Voting Rights Act.

"We have reconsidered our earlier determination in this matter based on the information and arguments you have advanced in support of your request, along with the other information in our files and comments received from other interested persons. In this instance, the information obtained from state officials was drawn from the deposition testimony and other evidence in State of South Carolina v. United States, 1:12-cv-00203 (D.D.C.), the pending declaratory judgment action seeking judicial preclearance for these changes under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

"Several of the experts reports produced in the case helped inform our analysis. Dr. Charles Stewart's analysis of Act R54's effect on the ability of minority voters to participate effectively in the political process was particularly persuasive in showing that Act R54 will have a discriminatory effect under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. In addition, we found the expert reports by Dr. Ted Arrington and Dr. Orville Burton to be particularly persuasive in showing that Act R54 was enacted with a discriminatory purpose. In light of these considerations, I remain unable to conclude that the State of South Carolina has carried its burden of showing that the submitted change in Section 5 of Act R54 neither has a discriminatory purpose nor will have a discriminatory effect. Georgia v. United States, supra; 28 C.F.R. 51.52. Therefore, on behalf of the Attorney General, I must decline to withdraw the December 23, 2011 objection to Section 5 of Act R54."

Following the DOJ objection to the law last December, . .

"The DOJ has refused to allow South Carolina to enact its Voter I.D. law, claiming it does not adequately protect voters from discrimination, per the 1965 Voting Rights Act," Wilson said in a release at the time. "However, very similar laws have been upheld by the United States Supreme Court (in the case of Indiana), and even pre-cleared by the DOJ itself (in the case of Georgia)."

Wilson also requested the DOJ reconsider its objection, which led to Perez' latest letter.

A three judge panel will hear the case later this month in federal court.

Wilson and S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley were not immediately available for comment.

JoSCh July 06, 2012 at 06:14 PM
I didn't forget it. What legislation are you referring to? The US Congress isn't attempting to pass legislation, are they?
Right Here July 06, 2012 at 06:17 PM
"You need an id to cash a check because the private institutions of banks require it." Wrong. Federal law requires it (money laundering, anti-terror legislation instituted after 9/11. "You need one to board a plane because the private institutions of airlines require it." Wrong again. Guess you haven't flown since 9/11. Try telling TSA you don't need a gov't issued photo id to board a plane. LOL.
JoSCh July 06, 2012 at 06:36 PM
TSA isn't checking id's going onto a plane, the airline reps are. The Patriot Act requires an ID to open an account or wire transfer, but not to cash checks. You should change your name to Wrong Here.
Right Here July 06, 2012 at 07:28 PM
Dude, let's go down to Greenville-Spartenburg airport. I'll put up $5000 against your $500 that you will not board a plane/jet whatever without showing a gov't issued photo id to TSA (at least once, most likely several times). If you believe otherwise your delusional and I'm done.
JoSCh July 06, 2012 at 07:39 PM
So when the responses delivered are precise you're done, got it. The TSA checks before you enter the terminal at MOST airports, but there are many municipal airports where you don't have to show id to get on the tarmac. Lets go to the Mt Pleasant muni airport and you can buy me a drink. It won't be $5k, but you will be stunned at how much it costs. Enjoy your weekend. You can thank the unions (and the Jews not incidentially) for it btw. Maseltov!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »